=================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/mandoc/mandoc.1,v retrieving revision 1.217 retrieving revision 1.219 diff -u -p -r1.217 -r1.219 --- mandoc/mandoc.1 2017/07/20 15:26:41 1.217 +++ mandoc/mandoc.1 2017/09/07 14:55:12 1.219 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -.\" $Id: mandoc.1,v 1.217 2017/07/20 15:26:41 schwarze Exp $ +.\" $Id: mandoc.1,v 1.219 2017/09/07 14:55:12 schwarze Exp $ .\" .\" Copyright (c) 2009, 2010, 2011 Kristaps Dzonsons .\" Copyright (c) 2012, 2014-2017 Ingo Schwarze @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ .\" ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF .\" OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. .\" -.Dd $Mdocdate: July 20 2017 $ +.Dd $Mdocdate: September 7 2017 $ .Dt MANDOC 1 .Os .Sh NAME @@ -315,6 +315,20 @@ and seven for .Xr man 7 . Increasing this is not recommended; it may result in degraded formatting, for example overfull lines or ugly line breaks. +.It Cm mdoc +Format +.Xr man 7 +input files in +.Xr mdoc 7 +output style. +Specifically, this suppresses the two additional blank lines near the +top and the bottom of each page, and it implies +.Fl O Cm indent Ns =5 . +One useful application is for checking that +.Fl T Cm man +output formats in the same way as the +.Xr mdoc 7 +source it was generated from. .It Cm width Ns = Ns Ar width The output width is set to .Ar width . @@ -741,7 +755,7 @@ Please use your good judgement to decide whether any p .Cm style suggestion really justifies a change to the input file. .It Cm base -A convertion used in the base system of a specific operating system +A convention used in the base system of a specific operating system is not adhered to. These are not markup mistakes, and neither the quality of formatting nor portability are in danger.